DRC Survey Results


Survey: DRC End of Semester Survey - Summer 2006


Total Number of Response: 24


Section: General Information

 
Semester:
 
  Fall 25%(6/24)
  Spring 8.33%(2/24)
  Summer 66.67%(16/24)


 
Please identify disability. (Check All that apply)
 
  Learning Disability 42.42%(14/33)
  Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 21.21%(7/33)
  Hearing 9.09%(3/33)
  Vision 0%(0/33)
  Psychological 6.06%(2/33)
  Acquired Brain Injury 6.06%(2/33)
  Mobility 0%(0/33)
  Health-Related Disability 9.09%(3/33)
  Other 6.06%(2/33)


 
Type of services/accommodations receiving: (Check all that apply)
 
  Assistive Technology 3.13%(1/32)
  Alternative Testing 50%(16/32)
  Note Taking 9.38%(3/32)
  Alternative Text 9.38%(3/32)
  Interpreter 0%(0/32)
  TypeWell 3.13%(1/32)
  CART (Captioning) 3.13%(1/32)
  Remote Captioning 0%(0/32)
  I did not receive any service this semester 21.88%(7/32)


 
The DRC staff responds to my questions and concerns.
 
  Strongly Agree 87.5%(21/24)
  Agree 8.33%(2/24)
  Neutral 0%(0/24)
  Disagree 4.17%(1/24)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/24)


 
The DRC staff effectively communicates my needs to faculty.
 
  Strongly Agree 70.83%(17/24)
  Agree 16.67%(4/24)
  Neutral 4.17%(1/24)
  Disagree 0%(0/24)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/24)
  Not Applicable 8.33%(2/24)


 
The DRC staff is effective in providing services and addressing my needs.
 
  Strongly Agree 70.83%(17/24)
  Agree 20.83%(5/24)
  Neutral 4.17%(1/24)
  Disagree 4.17%(1/24)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/24)


 
If warranted, I would use the DRC service again.
 
  Strongly Agree 87.5%(21/24)
  Agree 12.5%(3/24)
  Neutral 0%(0/24)
  Disagree 0%(0/24)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/24)


Section: Assistive Technology

 
The equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab operated reliably.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 100%(1/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab that I used to access my course materials.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Not Applicable 100%(1/1)


 
The physical environment of the Assistive Technology Lab provided an appropriate training and computing environment.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 100%(1/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The use of the technology in the Assistive Technology Lab has increased my ability to complete work independently.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 100%(1/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
Assistive Technologies provided to me by the DRC such as assistive listening devices, laptops, tape recorders, etc, functioned properly and were effective in meeting my needs.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Not Applicable 100%(1/1)


Section: Alternative Testing

 
Exams were scheduled within the preferred time that I requested.
 
  Strongly Agree 75%(12/16)
  Agree 6.25%(1/16)
  Neutral 18.75%(3/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)


 
Exams arrived on time for my scheduled test.
 
  Strongly Agree 62.5%(10/16)
  Agree 31.25%(5/16)
  Neutral 6.25%(1/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)


 
When necessary, the DRC staff communicated my needs effectively to faculty.
 
  Strongly Agree 68.75%(11/16)
  Agree 25%(4/16)
  Neutral 6.25%(1/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Not Applicable 0%(0/16)


 
The physical environment of the testing rooms inside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
 
  Strongly Agree 56.25%(9/16)
  Agree 25%(4/16)
  Neutral 6.25%(1/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Not Applicable 12.5%(2/16)


 
The physical environment of the testing rooms outside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
 
  Strongly Agree 43.75%(7/16)
  Agree 37.5%(6/16)
  Neutral 6.25%(1/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Not Applicable 12.5%(2/16)


 
Receiving alternative testing increases my opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of course material content.
 
  Strongly Agree 81.25%(13/16)
  Agree 18.75%(3/16)
  Neutral 0%(0/16)
  Disagree 0%(0/16)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/16)


Section: Note Taking

 
I received my notes from my notetaker in a timely manner.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(3/3)
  Agree 0%(0/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
The notes I received were clear and understandable.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(3/3)
  Agree 0%(0/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
My note taker noted important dates and information clearly.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(3/3)
  Agree 0%(0/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
My note taker showed a willingness to accept feedback and suggestions.
 
  Strongly Agree 66.67%(2/3)
  Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
My note taker made arrangements for me to receive notes in the event of his/her absence.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 0%(0/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Not Applicable 66.67%(2/3)


Section: Alternative Text

 
I received my alternative text in a timely manner and/or by syllabus dates.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 0%(0/3)
  Neutral 66.67%(2/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
I was able to navigate my data CDs and successfully access course materials.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Neutral 33.33%(1/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
My data CDs allowed for clear understanding of my course materials.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 66.67%(2/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
The screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) was an effective reading tool for my data CDs.
 
  Strongly Agree 66.67%(2/3)
  Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) that I used to access my course materials.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Not Applicable 33.33%(1/3)


 
Instructions on my data CDs were clear.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 66.67%(2/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


 
Receiving alternative text from the DRC increased my ability to master course requirements.
 
  Strongly Agree 33.33%(1/3)
  Agree 66.67%(2/3)
  Neutral 0%(0/3)
  Disagree 0%(0/3)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/3)


Section: Interpreter

 
The interpreter arrived on time.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The interpreter behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
I understood the interpreter.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The interpreter understood me when I signed.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The interpreter matched the teacher's expression (speed, mood, & meaning).
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The interpreter had clear fingerspelling.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The interpreter provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


Section: TypeWell

 
The transcriber arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The transcriber behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The transcriber provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
Important points and vocabularies were emphasized with bold type in my notes.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
I received my TypeWell notes within 24 hours.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


Section: CART (Captioning)

 
The captionist arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The captionist behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/1)
  Agree 100%(1/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
The captionist provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


 
I received my CART transcripts in a timely manner.
 
  Strongly Agree 100%(1/1)
  Agree 0%(0/1)
  Neutral 0%(0/1)
  Disagree 0%(0/1)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/1)


Section: Remote Captioning

 
The captionist called on time.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
I was able to access the captioned text website during class.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
The equipment I used for remote captioning operated reliably.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Nuetral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
I used DRC computer to access remote captioning.
 
  Yes 0%(0/0)
  No 0%(0/0)


 
I used my own computer to access remote captioning.
 
  Yes 0%(0/0)
  No 0%(0/0)


 
The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


 
I was able to download transcripts in a timely manner.
 
  Strongly Agree 0%(0/0)
  Agree 0%(0/0)
  Neutral 0%(0/0)
  Disagree 0%(0/0)
  Strongly Disagree 0%(0/0)


Section: Additional Information

 
Enrolled:
 
  Full-Time 45.83%(11/24)
  Part-Time 54.17%(13/24)


 
Age:
 
  16-18 0%(0/24)
  19-21 16.67%(4/24)
  22-26 25%(6/24)
  27-35 29.17%(7/24)
  36-45 16.67%(4/24)
  46+ 12.5%(3/24)


 
Class Standing:
 
  Freshman 8.33%(2/24)
  Sophomore 25%(6/24)
  Junior 20.83%(5/24)
  Senior 29.17%(7/24)
  Graduate 12.5%(3/24)
  Graduate Special 4.17%(1/24)
  Non-Degree 0%(0/24)


 
Gender:
 
  Male 26.09%(6/23)
  Female 73.91%(17/23)
  Transgender 0%(0/23)


 
Ethnic Background: (Check all that apply)
 
  Black, Non-Hispanic 4.17%(1/24)
  Hispanic 4.17%(1/24)
  Native American 4.17%(1/24)
  Asian, Pacific Islander 8.33%(2/24)
  White, Non-Hispanic 70.83%(17/24)
  Other 8.33%(2/24)