Survey: DRC End of Semester Survey - Summer 2005

Total Number of Respondents: 24

Section: General Information

Semester:
	Fall		4.17%	(1/24)
	Spring		16.67%	(4/24)
	Summer		79.17%	(19/24)

Please identify disability. (Check All that apply)
	Learning Disability		40.74%	(11/27)
	Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder		18.52%	(5/27)
	Hearing		3.7%	(1/27)
	Vision		0%	(0/27)
	Psychological		0%	(0/27)
	Acquired Brain Injury		0%	(0/27)
	Mobility		11.11%	(3/27)
	Health-Related Disability		11.11%	(3/27)
	Other		14.81%	(4/27)

Type of services/accommodations receiving: (Check all that apply)
	Assistive Technology		0%	(0/37)
	Alternative Testing		56.76%	(21/37)
	Note Taking		21.62%	(8/37)
	Alternative Text		16.22%	(6/37)
	Interpreter		0%	(0/37)
	TypeWell		2.7%	(1/37)
	CART (Captioning)		2.7%	(1/37)

The DRC staff is effective in providing services and addressing my needs.
	Strongly Agree		79.17%	(19/24)
	Agree		16.67%	(4/24)
	Neutral		0%	(0/24)
	Disagree		4.17%	(1/24)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/24)

The DRC staff is available to address my questions and concerns.
	Strongly Agree		66.67%	(16/24)
	Agree		25%	(6/24)
	Neutral		4.17%	(1/24)
	Disagree		0%	(0/24)
	Strongly Disagree		4.17%	(1/24)

The DRC staff effectively communicates my needs to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		62.5%	(15/24)
	Agree		25%	(6/24)
	Neutral		4.17%	(1/24)
	Disagree		8.33%	(2/24)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/24)

Section: Assistive Technology

The equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The DRC staff provided thorough training regarding the equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The physical environment of the Assistive Technology Lab provided an appropriate training and computing environment.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The use of the technology in the Assistive Technology Lab has increased my ability to complete work independently.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

Section: Alternative Testing

Exams were scheduled within the preferred time that I requested.
	Strongly Agree		52.38%	(11/21)
	Agree		33.33%	(7/21)
	Neutral		14.29%	(3/21)
	Disagree		0%	(0/21)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/21)

Exams arrived on time for my scheduled test.
	Strongly Agree		57.14%	(12/21)
	Agree		38.1%	(8/21)
	Neutral		4.76%	(1/21)
	Disagree		0%	(0/21)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/21)

When necessary, the DRC staff communicated my needs effectively to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		38.1%	(8/21)
	Agree		47.62%	(10/21)
	Neutral		9.52%	(2/21)
	Disagree		4.76%	(1/21)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/21)

The physical environment of the testing rooms provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		38.1%	(8/21)
	Agree		42.86%	(9/21)
	Neutral		9.52%	(2/21)
	Disagree		9.52%	(2/21)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/21)

Receiving alternative testing increases my opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of course material content.
	Strongly Agree		71.43%	(15/21)
	Agree		23.81%	(5/21)
	Neutral		4.76%	(1/21)
	Disagree		0%	(0/21)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/21)

Section: Note Taking

I received my notes from my notetaker in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		25%	(2/8)
	Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Neutral		25%	(2/8)
	Disagree		12.5%	(1/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

My note taker's handwriting was clear and easy to read.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Neutral		25%	(2/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

My note taker noted important dates and information clearly.
	Strongly Agree		25%	(2/8)
	Agree		25%	(2/8)
	Neutral		37.5%	(3/8)
	Disagree		12.5%	(1/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

My note taker showed a willingness to accept feedback and suggestions.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Neutral		25%	(2/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

My note taker made arrangements for me to receive notes in the event of his/her absence.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		25%	(2/8)
	Neutral		25%	(2/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		12.5%	(1/8)

Section: Alternative Text

I received my alternative text within 4 weeks after I requested it and/or by syllabus dates.
	Strongly Agree		66.67%	(4/6)
	Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

I was able to navigate my data CDs and successfully access course materials.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Neutral		33.33%	(2/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

My data CDs allowed for clear understanding of my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

The screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) was an effective reading tool for my data CDs.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

Instructions on my data CDs were clear.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		33.33%	(2/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

Receiving alternative text from the DRC increased my ability to master course requirements.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		0%	(0/6)
	Disagree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

Section: Interpreter

The interpreter arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I understood the interpreter.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The interpreter understood me when I signed.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The interpreter matched the teacher (speed, mood, & meaning).
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The interpreter had clear fingerspelling.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The interpreter provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

Section: TypeWell

The transcriber arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The transcriber behaved in a professional manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I read the TypeWell text on the computer screen during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I took my own TypeWell notes during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The information on the screen was spelled correctly and was understandable.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		100%	(1/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I received my TypeWell notes in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The transcriber provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Section: CART (Captioning)

The captionist arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The captionist behaved in a professional manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I read the CART text on the computer screen during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The information on the screen was spelled correctly and was understandable.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I received my CART transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		100%	(1/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The captionist provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Section: Additional Information

Enrolled:
	Full-Time		87.5%	(21/24)
	Part-Time		12.5%	(3/24)

Age:
	16-18		0%	(0/24)
	19-21		25%	(6/24)
	22-26		33.33%	(8/24)
	27-35		20.83%	(5/24)
	36-45		16.67%	(4/24)
	46+		4.17%	(1/24)

Class Standing:
	Freshman		0%	(0/24)
	Sophomore		8.33%	(2/24)
	Junior		33.33%	(8/24)
	Senior		50%	(12/24)
	Graduate		8.33%	(2/24)
	Graduate Special		0%	(0/24)
	Non-Degree		0%	(0/24)

Gender:
	Male		33.33%	(8/24)
	Female		66.67%	(16/24)
	Transgender		0%	(0/24)

Ethnic Background: (Check all that apply)
	Black, Non-Hispanic		0%	(0/26)
	Hispanic		7.69%	(2/26)
	Native American		3.85%	(1/26)
	Asian, Pacific Islander		11.54%	(3/26)
	White, Non-Hispanic		57.69%	(15/26)
	Other		19.23%	(5/26)