Survey: DRC End of Semester Survey - Spring 2006

Total Number of Response: 66

Section: General Information

Semester:
	Fall		4.62%	(3/65)
	Spring		92.31%	(60/65)
	Summer		3.08%	(2/65)

Please identify disability. (Check All that apply)
	Learning Disability		30.3%	(30/99)
	Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder		20.2%	(20/99)
	Hearing		6.06%	(6/99)
	Vision		1.01%	(1/99)
	Psychological		9.09%	(9/99)
	Acquired Brain Injury		2.02%	(2/99)
	Mobility		6.06%	(6/99)
	Health-Related Disability		10.1%	(10/99)
	Other		15.15%	(15/99)

Type of services/accommodations receiving: (Check all that apply)
	Assistive Technology		8%	(8/100)
	Alternative Testing		37%	(37/100)
	Note Taking		16%	(16/100)
	Alternative Text		14%	(14/100)
	Interpreter		2%	(2/100)
	TypeWell		5%	(5/100)
	CART (Captioning)		1%	(1/100)
	Remote Captioning		0%	(0/100)
	I did not receive any service this semester		17%	(17/100)

The DRC staff responds to my questions and concerns.
	Strongly Agree		71.21%	(47/66)
	Agree		19.7%	(13/66)
	Neutral		6.06%	(4/66)
	Disagree		3.03%	(2/66)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/66)

The DRC staff effectively communicates my needs to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		60.61%	(40/66)
	Agree		21.21%	(14/66)
	Neutral		9.09%	(6/66)
	Disagree		3.03%	(2/66)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/66)
	Not Applicable		6.06%	(4/66)

The DRC staff is effective in providing services and addressing my needs.
	Strongly Agree		66.67%	(44/66)
	Agree		24.24%	(16/66)
	Neutral		4.55%	(3/66)
	Disagree		3.03%	(2/66)
	Strongly Disagree		1.52%	(1/66)

If warranted, I would use the DRC service again.
	Strongly Agree		74.24%	(49/66)
	Agree		16.67%	(11/66)
	Neutral		4.55%	(3/66)
	Disagree		1.52%	(1/66)
	Strongly Disagree		3.03%	(2/66)

Section: Assistive Technology

The equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		62.5%	(5/8)
	Agree		0%	(0/8)
	Neutral		37.5%	(3/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab that I used to access my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(4/8)
	Agree		0%	(0/8)
	Neutral		50%	(4/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Not Applicable		0%	(0/8)

The physical environment of the Assistive Technology Lab provided an appropriate training and computing environment.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		12.5%	(1/8)
	Neutral		50%	(4/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

The use of the technology in the Assistive Technology Lab has increased my ability to complete work independently.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		0%	(0/8)
	Neutral		62.5%	(5/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)

Assistive Technologies provided to me by the DRC such as assistive listening devices, laptops, tape recorders, etc, functioned properly and were effective in meeting my needs.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(3/8)
	Agree		0%	(0/8)
	Neutral		50%	(4/8)
	Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/8)
	Not Applicable		12.5%	(1/8)

Section: Alternative Testing

Exams were scheduled within the preferred time that I requested.
	Strongly Agree		67.57%	(25/37)
	Agree		24.32%	(9/37)
	Neutral		8.11%	(3/37)
	Disagree		0%	(0/37)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/37)

Exams arrived on time for my scheduled test.
	Strongly Agree		54.05%	(20/37)
	Agree		32.43%	(12/37)
	Neutral		10.81%	(4/37)
	Disagree		2.7%	(1/37)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/37)

When necessary, the DRC staff communicated my needs effectively to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		56.76%	(21/37)
	Agree		21.62%	(8/37)
	Neutral		8.11%	(3/37)
	Disagree		2.7%	(1/37)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/37)
	Not Applicable		10.81%	(4/37)

The physical environment of the testing rooms inside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		48.65%	(18/37)
	Agree		21.62%	(8/37)
	Neutral		21.62%	(8/37)
	Disagree		2.7%	(1/37)
	Strongly Disagree		2.7%	(1/37)
	Not Applicable		2.7%	(1/37)

The physical environment of the testing rooms outside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		32.43%	(12/37)
	Agree		18.92%	(7/37)
	Neutral		13.51%	(5/37)
	Disagree		5.41%	(2/37)
	Strongly Disagree		2.7%	(1/37)
	Not Applicable		27.03%	(10/37)

Receiving alternative testing increases my opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of course material content.
	Strongly Agree		81.08%	(30/37)
	Agree		16.22%	(6/37)
	Neutral		2.7%	(1/37)
	Disagree		0%	(0/37)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/37)

Section: Note Taking

I received my notes from my notetaker in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		68.75%	(11/16)
	Agree		25%	(4/16)
	Neutral		6.25%	(1/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/16)

The notes I received were clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		62.5%	(10/16)
	Agree		31.25%	(5/16)
	Neutral		6.25%	(1/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/16)

My note taker noted important dates and information clearly.
	Strongly Agree		62.5%	(10/16)
	Agree		25%	(4/16)
	Neutral		12.5%	(2/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/16)

My note taker showed a willingness to accept feedback and suggestions.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(8/16)
	Agree		31.25%	(5/16)
	Neutral		12.5%	(2/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

My note taker made arrangements for me to receive notes in the event of his/her absence.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(6/16)
	Agree		18.75%	(3/16)
	Neutral		12.5%	(2/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Not Applicable		31.25%	(5/16)

Section: Alternative Text

I received my alternative text in a timely manner and/or by syllabus dates.
	Strongly Agree		42.86%	(6/14)
	Agree		28.57%	(4/14)
	Neutral		0%	(0/14)
	Disagree		28.57%	(4/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

I was able to navigate my data CDs and successfully access course materials.
	Strongly Agree		57.14%	(8/14)
	Agree		35.71%	(5/14)
	Neutral		7.14%	(1/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

My data CDs allowed for clear understanding of my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		35.71%	(5/14)
	Agree		50%	(7/14)
	Neutral		14.29%	(2/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

The screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) was an effective reading tool for my data CDs.
	Strongly Agree		35.71%	(5/14)
	Agree		50%	(7/14)
	Neutral		14.29%	(2/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) that I used to access my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		42.86%	(6/14)
	Agree		42.86%	(6/14)
	Neutral		7.14%	(1/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Not Applicable		7.14%	(1/14)

Instructions on my data CDs were clear.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(7/14)
	Agree		42.86%	(6/14)
	Neutral		7.14%	(1/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

Receiving alternative text from the DRC increased my ability to master course requirements.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(7/14)
	Agree		28.57%	(4/14)
	Neutral		21.43%	(3/14)
	Disagree		0%	(0/14)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/14)

Section: Interpreter

The interpreter arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		50%	(1/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

I understood the interpreter.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter understood me when I signed.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter matched the teacher's expression (speed, mood, & meaning).
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter had clear fingerspelling.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

Section: TypeWell

The transcriber arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
	Strongly Agree		60%	(3/5)
	Agree		40%	(2/5)
	Neutral		0%	(0/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

The transcriber behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		100%	(5/5)
	Agree		0%	(0/5)
	Neutral		0%	(0/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(5/5)
	Agree		0%	(0/5)
	Neutral		0%	(0/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

The transcriber provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		60%	(3/5)
	Agree		20%	(1/5)
	Neutral		20%	(1/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

Important points and vocabularies were emphasized with bold type in my notes.
	Strongly Agree		60%	(3/5)
	Agree		20%	(1/5)
	Neutral		20%	(1/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

I received my TypeWell notes within 24 hours.
	Strongly Agree		40%	(2/5)
	Agree		20%	(1/5)
	Neutral		40%	(2/5)
	Disagree		0%	(0/5)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/5)

Section: CART (Captioning)

The captionist arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The captionist behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The captionist provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I received my CART transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Section: Remote Captioning

The captionist called on time.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I was able to access the captioned text website during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The equipment I used for remote captioning operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Nuetral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I used DRC computer to access remote captioning.
	Yes		0%	(0/0)
	No		0%	(0/0)

I used my own computer to access remote captioning.
	Yes		0%	(0/0)
	No		0%	(0/0)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I was able to download transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

Section: Additional Information

Enrolled:
	Full-Time		85.94%	(55/64)
	Part-Time		14.06%	(9/64)

Age:
	16-18		1.54%	(1/65)
	19-21		20%	(13/65)
	22-26		29.23%	(19/65)
	27-35		16.92%	(11/65)
	36-45		9.23%	(6/65)
	46+		23.08%	(15/65)

Class Standing:
	Freshman		14.29%	(9/63)
	Sophomore		9.52%	(6/63)
	Junior		20.63%	(13/63)
	Senior		33.33%	(21/63)
	Graduate		15.87%	(10/63)
	Graduate Special		6.35%	(4/63)
	Non-Degree		0%	(0/63)

Gender:
	Male		26.98%	(17/63)
	Female		73.02%	(46/63)
	Transgender		0%	(0/63)

Ethnic Background: (Check all that apply)
	Black, Non-Hispanic		4.41%	(3/68)
	Hispanic		5.88%	(4/68)
	Native American		1.47%	(1/68)
	Asian, Pacific Islander		4.41%	(3/68)
	White, Non-Hispanic		76.47%	(52/68)
	Other		7.35%	(5/68)