Survey: DRC End of Semester Survey - Fall 2007

Total Number of Response: 75

Section: General Information

Semester:
	Fall		100%	(75/75)
	Spring		0%	(0/75)
	Summer		0%	(0/75)

Please identify disability. (Check All that apply)
	Learning Disability		29.09%	(32/110)
	Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder		21.82%	(24/110)
	Hearing		2.73%	(3/110)
	Vision		2.73%	(3/110)
	Psychological		12.73%	(14/110)
	Acquired Brain Injury		1.82%	(2/110)
	Mobility		3.64%	(4/110)
	Health-Related Disability		13.64%	(15/110)
	Other		11.82%	(13/110)

Type of services/accommodations receiving: (Check all that apply)
	Assistive Technology		4%	(4/100)
	Alternative Testing		46%	(46/100)
	Note Taking		12%	(12/100)
	Alternative Text		11%	(11/100)
	Interpreter		1%	(1/100)
	TypeWell		1%	(1/100)
	CART (Captioning)		2%	(2/100)
	Remote Captioning		0%	(0/100)
	I did not receive any service this semester		23%	(23/100)

The DRC staff responds to my questions and concerns.
	Strongly Agree		70.67%	(53/75)
	Agree		20%	(15/75)
	Neutral		6.67%	(5/75)
	Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)
	Strongly Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)

The DRC staff effectively communicates my needs to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		52%	(39/75)
	Agree		25.33%	(19/75)
	Neutral		6.67%	(5/75)
	Disagree		6.67%	(5/75)
	Strongly Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)
	Not Applicable		8%	(6/75)

The DRC staff is effective in providing services and addressing my needs.
	Strongly Agree		68%	(51/75)
	Agree		21.33%	(16/75)
	Neutral		5.33%	(4/75)
	Disagree		4%	(3/75)
	Strongly Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)

If warranted, I would use the DRC service again.
	Strongly Agree		80%	(60/75)
	Agree		16%	(12/75)
	Neutral		1.33%	(1/75)
	Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)
	Strongly Disagree		1.33%	(1/75)

Section: Assistive Technology

The equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(2/4)
	Agree		25%	(1/4)
	Neutral		25%	(1/4)
	Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/4)

The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab that I used to access my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		25%	(1/4)
	Agree		50%	(2/4)
	Neutral		0%	(0/4)
	Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Not Applicable		25%	(1/4)

The physical environment of the Assistive Technology Lab provided an appropriate training and computing environment.
	Strongly Agree		75%	(3/4)
	Agree		0%	(0/4)
	Neutral		25%	(1/4)
	Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/4)

The use of the technology in the Assistive Technology Lab has increased my ability to complete work independently.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/4)
	Agree		50%	(2/4)
	Neutral		50%	(2/4)
	Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/4)

Assistive Technologies provided to me by the DRC such as assistive listening devices, laptops, tape recorders, etc, functioned properly and were effective in meeting my needs.
	Strongly Agree		25%	(1/4)
	Agree		50%	(2/4)
	Neutral		0%	(0/4)
	Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/4)
	Not Applicable		25%	(1/4)

Section: Alternative Testing

Exams were scheduled within the preferred time that I requested.
	Strongly Agree		69.57%	(32/46)
	Agree		28.26%	(13/46)
	Neutral		2.17%	(1/46)
	Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)

Exams arrived on time for my scheduled test.
	Strongly Agree		69.57%	(32/46)
	Agree		28.26%	(13/46)
	Neutral		2.17%	(1/46)
	Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)

When necessary, the DRC staff communicated my needs effectively to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		60.87%	(28/46)
	Agree		21.74%	(10/46)
	Neutral		6.52%	(3/46)
	Disagree		2.17%	(1/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Not Applicable		8.7%	(4/46)

The physical environment of the testing rooms inside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		56.52%	(26/46)
	Agree		26.09%	(12/46)
	Neutral		6.52%	(3/46)
	Disagree		4.35%	(2/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Not Applicable		6.52%	(3/46)

The physical environment of the testing rooms outside the DRC provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		43.48%	(20/46)
	Agree		21.74%	(10/46)
	Neutral		4.35%	(2/46)
	Disagree		6.52%	(3/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Not Applicable		23.91%	(11/46)

Receiving alternative testing increases my opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of course material content.
	Strongly Agree		78.26%	(36/46)
	Agree		15.22%	(7/46)
	Neutral		6.52%	(3/46)
	Disagree		0%	(0/46)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/46)

Section: Note Taking

I received my notes from my notetaker in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		41.67%	(5/12)
	Agree		41.67%	(5/12)
	Neutral		16.67%	(2/12)
	Disagree		0%	(0/12)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/12)

The notes I received were clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(4/12)
	Agree		41.67%	(5/12)
	Neutral		25%	(3/12)
	Disagree		0%	(0/12)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/12)

My note taker noted important dates and information clearly.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(4/12)
	Agree		33.33%	(4/12)
	Neutral		33.33%	(4/12)
	Disagree		0%	(0/12)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/12)

My note taker showed a willingness to accept feedback and suggestions.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(4/12)
	Agree		33.33%	(4/12)
	Neutral		25%	(3/12)
	Disagree		8.33%	(1/12)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/12)

My note taker made arrangements for me to receive notes in the event of his/her absence.
	Strongly Agree		25%	(3/12)
	Agree		25%	(3/12)
	Neutral		25%	(3/12)
	Disagree		0%	(0/12)
	Strongly Disagree		8.33%	(1/12)
	Not Applicable		16.67%	(2/12)

Section: Alternative Text

I received my alternative text in a timely manner and/or by syllabus dates.
	Strongly Agree		36.36%	(4/11)
	Agree		27.27%	(3/11)
	Neutral		27.27%	(3/11)
	Disagree		9.09%	(1/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

I was able to navigate my data CDs and successfully access course materials.
	Strongly Agree		54.55%	(6/11)
	Agree		45.45%	(5/11)
	Neutral		0%	(0/11)
	Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

My data CDs allowed for clear understanding of my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		54.55%	(6/11)
	Agree		45.45%	(5/11)
	Neutral		0%	(0/11)
	Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

The screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) was an effective reading tool for my data CDs.
	Strongly Agree		54.55%	(6/11)
	Agree		36.36%	(4/11)
	Neutral		9.09%	(1/11)
	Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

The DRC staff provided adequate training in the DRC regarding the screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) that I used to access my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		36.36%	(4/11)
	Agree		45.45%	(5/11)
	Neutral		0%	(0/11)
	Disagree		9.09%	(1/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Not Applicable		9.09%	(1/11)

Instructions on my data CDs were clear.
	Strongly Agree		36.36%	(4/11)
	Agree		63.64%	(7/11)
	Neutral		0%	(0/11)
	Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

Receiving alternative text from the DRC increased my ability to master course requirements.
	Strongly Agree		54.55%	(6/11)
	Agree		45.45%	(5/11)
	Neutral		0%	(0/11)
	Disagree		0%	(0/11)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/11)

Section: Interpreter

The interpreter arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		100%	(1/1)

The interpreter behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I understood the interpreter.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The interpreter understood me when I signed.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		100%	(1/1)

The interpreter matched the teacher's expression (speed, mood, & meaning).
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		100%	(1/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The interpreter had clear fingerspelling.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The interpreter provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		100%	(1/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Section: TypeWell

The transcriber arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The transcriber behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

The transcriber provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Important points and vocabularies were emphasized with bold type in my notes.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

I received my TypeWell notes within 24 hours.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(1/1)
	Agree		0%	(0/1)
	Neutral		0%	(0/1)
	Disagree		0%	(0/1)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/1)

Section: CART (Captioning)

The captionist arrived on time and was prepared at the begining of the class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The captionist behaved in a professional manner (acted appropriately, refrained from providing me any counsel, advice, or personal opinion, and maintained confidentiality).
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The captionist provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

I received my CART transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

Section: Remote Captioning

The captionist called on time.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I was able to access the captioned text website during class.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

The equipment I used for remote captioning operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Nuetral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I used DRC computer to access remote captioning.
	Yes		0%	(0/0)
	No		0%	(0/0)

I used my own computer to access remote captioning.
	Yes		0%	(0/0)
	No		0%	(0/0)

The information on the screen was clear and understandable.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

I was able to download transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Agree		0%	(0/0)
	Neutral		0%	(0/0)
	Disagree		0%	(0/0)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/0)

Section: Additional Information

Enrolled:
	Full-Time		71.62%	(53/74)
	Part-Time		28.38%	(21/74)

Age:
	16-18		2.7%	(2/74)
	19-21		27.03%	(20/74)
	22-26		28.38%	(21/74)
	27-35		20.27%	(15/74)
	36-45		9.46%	(7/74)
	46+		12.16%	(9/74)

Class Standing:
	Freshman		4%	(3/75)
	Sophomore		16%	(12/75)
	Junior		32%	(24/75)
	Senior		28%	(21/75)
	Graduate		14.67%	(11/75)
	Graduate Special		4%	(3/75)
	Non-Degree		1.33%	(1/75)

Gender:
	Male		32.43%	(24/74)
	Female		67.57%	(50/74)
	Transgender		0%	(0/74)

Ethnic Background: (Check all that apply)
	Black, Non-Hispanic		3.66%	(3/82)
	Hispanic		3.66%	(3/82)
	Native American		4.88%	(4/82)
	Asian, Pacific Islander		6.1%	(5/82)
	White, Non-Hispanic		75.61%	(62/82)
	Other		6.1%	(5/82)