Survey: DRC End of Semester Survey - Fall 2005

Total Number of Respondents: 88

Section: General Information

Semester:
	Fall		97.7%	(85/87)
	Spring		2.3%	(2/87)
	Summer		0%	(0/87)

Please identify disability. (Check All that apply)
	Learning Disability		26.61%	(33/124)
	Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder		16.13%	(20/124)
	Hearing		7.26%	(9/124)
	Vision		6.45%	(8/124)
	Psychological		7.26%	(9/124)
	Acquired Brain Injury		2.42%	(3/124)
	Mobility		8.06%	(10/124)
	Health-Related Disability		12.1%	(15/124)
	Other		13.71%	(17/124)

Type of services/accommodations receiving: (Check all that apply)
	Assistive Technology		12.2%	(15/123)
	Alternative Testing		48.78%	(60/123)
	Note Taking		17.89%	(22/123)
	Alternative Text		13.01%	(16/123)
	Interpreter		1.63%	(2/123)
	TypeWell		4.88%	(6/123)
	CART (Captioning)		1.63%	(2/123)

The DRC staff is effective in providing services and addressing my needs.
	Strongly Agree		73.86%	(65/88)
	Agree		17.05%	(15/88)
	Neutral		4.55%	(4/88)
	Disagree		2.27%	(2/88)
	Strongly Disagree		2.27%	(2/88)

The DRC staff is available to address my questions and concerns.
	Strongly Agree		75%	(66/88)
	Agree		14.77%	(13/88)
	Neutral		7.95%	(7/88)
	Disagree		0%	(0/88)
	Strongly Disagree		2.27%	(2/88)

The DRC staff effectively communicates my needs to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		64.77%	(57/88)
	Agree		23.86%	(21/88)
	Neutral		7.95%	(7/88)
	Disagree		1.14%	(1/88)
	Strongly Disagree		2.27%	(2/88)

Section: Assistive Technology

The equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab operated reliably.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(5/15)
	Agree		33.33%	(5/15)
	Neutral		33.33%	(5/15)
	Disagree		0%	(0/15)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/15)

The DRC staff provided thorough training regarding the equipment in the Assistive Technology Lab.
	Strongly Agree		26.67%	(4/15)
	Agree		26.67%	(4/15)
	Neutral		46.67%	(7/15)
	Disagree		0%	(0/15)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/15)

The physical environment of the Assistive Technology Lab provided an appropriate training and computing environment.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(5/15)
	Agree		20%	(3/15)
	Neutral		46.67%	(7/15)
	Disagree		0%	(0/15)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/15)

The use of the technology in the Assistive Technology Lab has increased my ability to complete work independently.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(5/15)
	Agree		20%	(3/15)
	Neutral		46.67%	(7/15)
	Disagree		0%	(0/15)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/15)

Section: Alternative Testing

Exams were scheduled within the preferred time that I requested.
	Strongly Agree		60%	(36/60)
	Agree		33.33%	(20/60)
	Neutral		6.67%	(4/60)
	Disagree		0%	(0/60)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/60)

Exams arrived on time for my scheduled test.
	Strongly Agree		60%	(36/60)
	Agree		28.33%	(17/60)
	Neutral		11.67%	(7/60)
	Disagree		0%	(0/60)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/60)

When necessary, the DRC staff communicated my needs effectively to faculty.
	Strongly Agree		63.33%	(38/60)
	Agree		28.33%	(17/60)
	Neutral		6.67%	(4/60)
	Disagree		0%	(0/60)
	Strongly Disagree		1.67%	(1/60)

The physical environment of the testing rooms provided for an appropriate alternative testing situation.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(30/60)
	Agree		33.33%	(20/60)
	Neutral		6.67%	(4/60)
	Disagree		8.33%	(5/60)
	Strongly Disagree		1.67%	(1/60)

Receiving alternative testing increases my opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of course material content.
	Strongly Agree		80%	(48/60)
	Agree		11.67%	(7/60)
	Neutral		8.33%	(5/60)
	Disagree		0%	(0/60)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/60)

Section: Note Taking

I received my notes from my notetaker in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		63.64%	(14/22)
	Agree		9.09%	(2/22)
	Neutral		18.18%	(4/22)
	Disagree		4.55%	(1/22)
	Strongly Disagree		4.55%	(1/22)

My note taker's handwriting was clear and easy to read.
	Strongly Agree		54.55%	(12/22)
	Agree		18.18%	(4/22)
	Neutral		22.73%	(5/22)
	Disagree		4.55%	(1/22)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/22)

My note taker noted important dates and information clearly.
	Strongly Agree		36.36%	(8/22)
	Agree		36.36%	(8/22)
	Neutral		27.27%	(6/22)
	Disagree		0%	(0/22)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/22)

My note taker showed a willingness to accept feedback and suggestions.
	Strongly Agree		45.45%	(10/22)
	Agree		18.18%	(4/22)
	Neutral		27.27%	(6/22)
	Disagree		4.55%	(1/22)
	Strongly Disagree		4.55%	(1/22)

My note taker made arrangements for me to receive notes in the event of his/her absence.
	Strongly Agree		31.82%	(7/22)
	Agree		22.73%	(5/22)
	Neutral		27.27%	(6/22)
	Disagree		9.09%	(2/22)
	Strongly Disagree		9.09%	(2/22)

Section: Alternative Text

I received my alternative text within 4 weeks after I requested it and/or by syllabus dates.
	Strongly Agree		43.75%	(7/16)
	Agree		25%	(4/16)
	Neutral		18.75%	(3/16)
	Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

I was able to navigate my data CDs and successfully access course materials.
	Strongly Agree		43.75%	(7/16)
	Agree		31.25%	(5/16)
	Neutral		18.75%	(3/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

My data CDs allowed for clear understanding of my course materials.
	Strongly Agree		37.5%	(6/16)
	Agree		37.5%	(6/16)
	Neutral		18.75%	(3/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

The screen reader and/or text-to-speech software (ReadPlease) was an effective reading tool for my data CDs.
	Strongly Agree		43.75%	(7/16)
	Agree		18.75%	(3/16)
	Neutral		25%	(4/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		12.5%	(2/16)

Instructions on my data CDs were clear.
	Strongly Agree		43.75%	(7/16)
	Agree		18.75%	(3/16)
	Neutral		31.25%	(5/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

Receiving alternative text from the DRC increased my ability to master course requirements.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(8/16)
	Agree		18.75%	(3/16)
	Neutral		25%	(4/16)
	Disagree		0%	(0/16)
	Strongly Disagree		6.25%	(1/16)

Section: Interpreter

The interpreter arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		50%	(1/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

I understood the interpreter.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		50%	(1/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter understood me when I signed.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter matched the teacher (speed, mood, & meaning).
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		50%	(1/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter had clear fingerspelling.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The interpreter provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		50%	(1/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

Section: TypeWell

The transcriber arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

The transcriber behaved in a professional manner.
	Strongly Agree		66.67%	(4/6)
	Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

I read the TypeWell text on the computer screen during class.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Neutral		16.67%	(1/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

I took my own TypeWell notes during class.
	Strongly Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Neutral		50%	(3/6)
	Disagree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

The information on the screen was spelled correctly and was understandable.
	Strongly Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		33.33%	(2/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

I received my TypeWell notes in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(3/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		0%	(0/6)
	Disagree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

The transcriber provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		16.67%	(1/6)
	Agree		33.33%	(2/6)
	Neutral		50%	(3/6)
	Disagree		0%	(0/6)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/6)

Section: CART (Captioning)

The captionist arrived on time.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		50%	(1/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The captionist behaved in a professional manner.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		50%	(1/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

I read the CART text on the computer screen during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The information on the screen was spelled correctly and was understandable.
	Strongly Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Agree		50%	(1/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

I received my CART transcripts in a timely manner.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

The captionist provided communication access which allowed me to actively participate during class.
	Strongly Agree		100%	(2/2)
	Agree		0%	(0/2)
	Neutral		0%	(0/2)
	Disagree		0%	(0/2)
	Strongly Disagree		0%	(0/2)

Section: Additional Information

Enrolled:
	Full-Time		78.16%	(68/87)
	Part-Time		21.84%	(19/87)

Age:
	16-18		6.82%	(6/88)
	19-21		20.45%	(18/88)
	22-26		20.45%	(18/88)
	27-35		23.86%	(21/88)
	36-45		15.91%	(14/88)
	46+		12.5%	(11/88)

Class Standing:
	Freshman		10.47%	(9/86)
	Sophomore		12.79%	(11/86)
	Junior		18.6%	(16/86)
	Senior		40.7%	(35/86)
	Graduate		15.12%	(13/86)
	Graduate Special		1.16%	(1/86)
	Non-Degree		1.16%	(1/86)

Gender:
	Male		29.55%	(26/88)
	Female		69.32%	(61/88)
	Transgender		1.14%	(1/88)

Ethnic Background: (Check all that apply)
	Black, Non-Hispanic		4.3%	(4/93)
	Hispanic		5.38%	(5/93)
	Native American		1.08%	(1/93)
	Asian, Pacific Islander		7.53%	(7/93)
	White, Non-Hispanic		73.12%	(68/93)
	Other		8.6%	(8/93)