Skip Site Navigation
Skip To Page Content

31. Responsibilities: IRB Members

In carrying out their duties, IRB chairs and members

  • must execute their responsibilities in accordance with University policies and applicable federal, state, and local and laws;
  • ensure that the seven criteria for IRB approval (§46.111) are met for all protocol review assignments including expedited reviews and reviews at convened meetings;
  • must complete the required human subjects protection training and HIPAA training, as applicable;
  • are encouraged to participate in training opportunities offered outside of IRB meetings;
  • are expected to attend at least 75% of scheduled IRB meetings (according to panel assignment);
  • notify RIO staff in advance if there is a need to be absent from a scheduled meeting;
  • arrive promptly and stay at convened meetings until all committee business and training has been completed;
  • prepare for meetings and complete all review checklists when assigned as primary or secondary reviewer for specific protocols;
  • are familiar with protocols on the agenda when attending as a voting member;
  • participate in IRB discussions of protocols;
  • complete expedited reviews review checklists in a timely manner (within 10 business days of receipt);
  • may act as a resource for researchers in the design of human subjects protection aspects of protocol development;
  • maintain confidentiality regarding reviewed protocols; and
  • comply with University and IRB conflict of interest policy and procedures.

In evaluating the risks and benefits of the study, IRB chairs and members have the additional responsibilities to

  • consider the adequacy of inclusion/exclusion criteria to enroll individuals most likely to benefit from and least likely to be harmed by the research;
  • determine if the inclusion/exclusion criteria have an ethical basis;
  • verify the adequacy of the consent document for informing subjects about the research, including risks and benefits;
  • evaluate the clarity and appropriateness of the information in consent documents with consideration for the sample populations; and
  • verify the consent documents are consistent with IRB protocols.

The IRB Community Member has the particular responsibility of bringing the perspective of the volunteer research participant to the review process.

University Block N Logo

University of Nevada, Reno

University of Nevada, Reno
1664 N. Virginia Street
Reno,  NV  89557-

(775) 784-1110
Website Help
Contact Us

Copyright
Privacy
Accessibility Tools

Emergency Information
Emergency Alerts
Doing business with us