You are here: Nevada Home > Office of the President > Principles for Budget Reductions
| Contact Information for Office of the President | |
|---|---|
| Phone | (775) 784-4805 |
| Fax | (775) 784-6429 |
| Location |
Clark Administration
200 |
| Address | 1664 N. Virginia Street Reno, NV 89557-001 |
| Contact | President's Office Staff |
Under the executive budget proposed by Governor Sandoval, the cumulative cut in state support of the University of Nevada, Reno will be 40% over FY09-13. No institution can handle cuts of that stunning scale without significant losses and long-term transformation. The university simply cannot afford all the teaching, research, and outreach functions it has historically supported. We will have to offer fewer programs, support less research, perhaps teach fewer students, and re-evaluate the place of athletics at the university.
In response to the unprecedented reduction of the base budget, the Faculty Senate Executive Board and Provost Marc Johnson agreed to form an advisory committee to work with the provost in devising principles and priorities to guide strategic preservation of the university. Members of the Senate were asked to suggest faculty to serve, and the provost formed the committee at the end of February.
The plan was for the committee to work through the spring semester to establish principles for guiding budget cuts that would occur following the legislative session. However, that timetable was truncated by the legislature's request for a full accounting of possible budget cuts by April 5th. The Faculty Budget Advisory Committee met for the first time on March 7th and submitted these recommendations on April 3rd.
Together, the provost and the advisory committee have worked to articulate principles and priorities to guide the decision-making that must occur under severe fiscal constraints. There is no sound way to apply such principles in rank order or to devise an algorithm to apply with no subsequent judgment; strategic preservation requires difficult and complex decisions. This process will entail more than cutting academic programs, administrative units, and athletic programs. It will also require creative thinking about how best to sustain core strengths. To that end-and anticipating continued economic distress-the committee has focused on how to manage damage to the university so that it might be able to recover in the future.
The University of Nevada, Reno is a research institution with a complement of undergraduate and graduate degree programs in the liberal arts and sciences and professional programs that serve its historic land-grant mission. The university must strive to preserve as many of its strengths as possible in a time when fiscal realities require that it contract precipitously. To that end, we recommend the following principles and priorities, recognizing that the strategies necessary to implement them will be difficult.
Graduate the maximum number of well-prepared undergraduates possible.
Maintain an environment for strong research and strong graduate programs.
Professional schools that are central to the teaching and research missions or economic development are a higher priority than those that are less central.
Tenure-track faculty who support the full mission of teaching, research, and service are of greatest priority.
Larger administrative units are preferable to smaller units to accomplish the university's teaching and research missions effectively and efficiently.
Use resources wisely.
Academics must be the university's highest priority.
Obtaining diverse sources of revenue is increasingly desirable and necessary.
Our obligation in working with the provost to recommend these principles and priorities has been to keep the long-term health of the university foremost. Our goal is that the University of Nevada, Reno survive these unprecedented, difficult times as a university that has 1) retained its teaching and research mission, 2) sustained its core strengths in the root disciplines, and 3) creatively and strategically reorganized itself to make best use of scant resources.
Faculty Budget Advisory Committee, 2011