University of Nevada, Reno: Comprehensive Master Plan Web Site. Click to navigate to the home page.
Work Session #2 - 22&23 January 2004


Purpose
The second work session focused on program projections, an analysis of existing conditions, and the discussion of three preliminary organizational concepts for the campus's expansion.

Document icon. Check for downloadable documents in this section. Download & Print

Work Session #2
Full Conference Report

PDF 1.3 MB


List of Exhibits

The following exhibits were displayed for the meetings. The majority of these exhibits are contained in the Topical Briefs. Exhibits not part of the topical are found at the end of this conference report.

•  Goals - Reached during work session 1

•  Existing Land Use Patterns

•  Existing Functional Use of University Buildings

•  Existing Campus Zones of Use

•  Existing Ownership Patterns

•  Topographic Elevations

•  Topographic Slope

•  Current and Planned Demolitions

•  Potential Building Demolitions

•  Historic Buildings and Districts

•  Program Need Chart

•  Projected Program Demands (Volume Diagram)

•  Existing Vehicular and Pedestrian Routes

•  Census Map: Percentage of Owner Occupied Residences

•  Existing Vehicle Distribution

•  Existing Transportation Conditions—Parking

•  Existing Transportation Conditions—Transit and Railroad

•  Existing Transportation Conditions—Pedestrian and Bicycle

•  Current Planned Transportation Improvements

•  Displaced Parking Due to Mid-campus Construction

•  Existing Storm Drainage

•  Existing Sanitary Sewer Mains

•  Existing Water Mains

•  Existing Gas Mains

•  Existing Fire Protection

•  Land Use

•  City of Reno Land Use Designations

•  City of Reno Existing Zoning

•  West University Neighborhood Plan

•  Northeast Neighborhood Plan

•  Existing Chilled Water System

•  Existing Heating Water System

•  Existing Electrical systems

•  Existing Campus Communication System

•  Existing Campus Character

•  Opportunities and Constraints

•  Development Zones

•  Concepts of Possible Campus Plans – Alternatives 1, 2, and 3





Summary

The following highlights the items discussed throughout the two-day work session, providing an overview by topic.

Residential

Program projections based on interviews with UNR projected a conservative number of beds for students. Upon further discussion, the master plan will reflect projections of Current at 22%, Horizon 1 at 35%, and Horizon 2 at 50%. Both the university and the private sector would provide housing. The 50% residential ratio is for students only. Future program projections will include allowances for faculty and staff.

Research Space

As with residential projections, research space projections were conservative. Discussions indicated that more research space should be allocated. Research space addresses three needs:

•  Research space aligned with academic program; i.e. high student involvement.
Such space is associated with core academic uses

•  Research space associated with the medical school. Such space will be located in the area of the medical school facilities.

•  Research space associated with low student ratios, higher levels of security clearance, and public-public and public-private partnerships. Such uses do not have a strong academic affinity and can be located outside the core academic areas of the campus.

Meeting with the City on the
Proposed Mixed Use Development South of I-80

Sasaki will meet with City staff to present and discuss opportunities to form a partnership between the city, the university and the community in an effort to improve the quality of life around the university and to create initiatives for private and public development. The sessions emphasized campus opinion regarding the fact that community members don't feel comfortable visiting the campus. The campus community agreed they want people to feel they are part of the university. Everyone agrees that there are few opportunities for shopping and dining in close proximity to the university. It was suggested that the only good off-campus lunch venue is the Record Street Café.

Judicial College and National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

Concern was raised during Open Meeting #3 over the relationship between these two organizations and the University. A work session participant stated that if space was not created for these organizations, then they would leave the Reno area. UNR would lose the status as a center of judicial education and Reno would lose the economic development impact of these organizations. This conflicted with the findings of the consultant interviews regarding space needs.

Conference Center

In Open Meeting #3 the public raised a question over whether or not a conference center was in the master plan. There is no conference center in the master plan as of now.

Housing Offices and Link to Private Sector

The public and student representatives expressed concern that there was not an easily accessible transportation service on campus that links the students to private rental housing information in the area. They requested that a Housing Office be created in order to support a more residential campus. Later, in response, the university stated that the Residential Life Office has this role.

Lack of Public Space Outdoors

The public, especially the students, raised the concern that there is not enough public space outdoors to foster community interaction. The President's Council agreed and the consultants will explore the integration of open space into the alternatives.

Walkability

The time interval between classes is an issue in the expansion of campus. Each scheme has it's disadvantage in terms of accommodating 10 or 15 minute change of class schedules.

Student Hub

Student representatives raised the concern that all the concepts (especially #1 and #2) challenged one central student hub and that they would like to see more gathering spaces on campus. With a 20,000+ student body however, there would most likely be at least two student hubs with additional gathering spaces distributed throughout the campus.

Parking

The master plan estimated land need based on parking projections being addressed by 50% in structure and 50% in surface parking. Some participants expressed concern if this planning effort (as well as the Mid-Campus Master Plan) addressed ADA access sufficiently. The consultants indicated that the master plan will reflect ADA requirements and will carry the spirit of ADA through universal design. The goal of the parking and transportation plan centers around equal accessibility for all involved. The master plan will promote walkability and bicycle use on the campus. More pedestrian connections from east and west need to be created and are included in the alternatives. The discussion of access brought to mind the potential need to possibly create pedestrian zones that have alternative managed means of access for vehicles. The consultants will study this as they develop the alternatives

Alumni Development Center

A new facility that would replace Ross Hall facing the historic quad was discussed in response to the expressed need for a facility to accommodate development (donor funding) needs.



Home > Work-to-date > 4 February 2003 Conference Report