Domestic
Violence: This continuing project on domestic violence issues
is sponsored by the Committee Against Domestic Violence with funding from
the Nevada Attorney General’s Office. The focus of this project
is on the problem of serving TROs (Temporary Restraining Orders), only
half of which are properly served in the state of Nevada. We are attempting
to find out why this is the case, and what can be done about it. This
project supports one RA at the Center. The project may be expanded into
other areas of concern with domestic violence, and is leading to development
of at least one other grant proposal to be submitted early this year.
K-12 Educational Outcomes: Another project within the
State Department of Education supports two RAs, and focuses on issues
related to retention of students, particularly minority ones. We are assisting
in evaluating some of the testing used in the No Child Left Behind Federal
Act, to see what impacts these test have on various populations. This
project will continue through the next year at least.
NCJFCJ Study of Washington, D.C. Family Courts: One project
that was completed in Fall, 2003, with the National Council of Juvenile
and Family Court Judges Permanency Planning Division involved coding and
data entry for a study of the Washington. D.C. family court system.
Jury Reform in Colorado: The Center has a large data
set relevant to jury reform in Colorado. It is anticipated that this data
set will result in some publications and also possible future grant funding
to do follow-up research on jury reform issues.
Technologies of Evidence Presentation: One Center RA,
Roni Dahir, has a NSF dissertation grant which supports a study of the
effects on juror decision making of modern means of evidence presentation,
such as video taping and simulations. This work is nearing completion,
and another grant to NSF has been submitted to continue this line of research
Science Education in Law Schools: A proposal was recently
submitted to the Law School Council to fund research on the knowledge
of science gained by law school students in America’s law schools.
The research focuses not on students but on law school faculty and materials
used in law-related courses.
Science in Courts: Some years ago the Center and the
Judicial Studies program collaborated on research to study trial judge
knowledge of science and evidence law dealing with scientific and other
expert testimony. The study was funded by the State Justice Institute,
with additional support by the Federal Judicial Center, and the National
Judicial College and the NCJFCJ. An important result from this study was
a ”benchbook” that is being used by judges around the world
and in judicial education courses. It is available electronically from
the URL: www.unr.edu/bench. We are continuing to work with this data set
for further publications, and are also developing other grant proposals
to continue our work in the area of science in the courts.
Judicial Performance: The Center has been working with
the Judicial Studies program on a project for the American Bar Association
and the National Judicial College on assessing judicial performance. The
Judicial Studies program was asked by the ABA to comment on the set of
guidelines published in 1985 by the ABA for assessments of judicial performance.
These guidelines were prepared initially to guide assessment efforts that
were being done often for political reasons. Preliminary results were
presented on Feb. 7 to an ABA committee at a meeting in San Antonio
Problem-Solving Courts: This joint project with the NCJFCJ
deals with assessing so-called “problem-solving” family courts
in Utah. The issue is whether these courts, which are sometimes called
“therapeutic courts,” function as well or better than traditional
courts that operate more of an adversarial model. The Utah project is
exploratory in nature, and it is anticipated that further related research
will result from it.
Minority Religions and Governmental Regulation: The Center
Director continues to be engaged in research on treatment of minority
religions around the world, and has just published a large edited volume:
Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe (Kluwer/Plenum,
2004).
|