Meeting Minutes,
Members
Present:
Stacy
Burton, Chair and A&S, Humanities
Bob
Ives for Kathryn Obenchain, Education
Jeri
Bigbee, HCS
Dana
Edberg, Faculty Senate Representative
Donica
Mensing, Journalism
James
Winn, A&S, Fine Arts
Tracy
Veach, Medicine
James
Sundali, Business
Scott
Tyler, Mines
Jessica
Muehlberg, President, GSA
Members
Absent:
Linda
Brinkley, VP for Research and Dean of the
Richard
Davies, A&S, Social Sciences
Rangesan
Narayanan, Agriculture
Non
Members attending:
Susan
Henthorn, GSA Advisor
Michael
Peters, recorder
Hilary
Case
Kevin
Gaw
Old
Business
1. The Chair called the meeting to order at
2. Response from Provost on Role of Graduate Council in Program Review
(attachment): Council discussed the
Provost’s response, specifically the suggestion that the entire Council consult
with the Provost to develop the conclusions and recommendations for each
program review in that this might be an unwieldy tasking for the Council. Suggestions included,
- the Council preparing guidelines
for review to be used by a council representative in assessing a particular
program review so as to ensure consistency and quality of review.
-
ensuring that the council’s representative is not from the same college
as the program under review.
-
that the council designate a subcommittee to handle program reviews in
much the same way as the council once had a subcommittee assigned to review
applications to graduate faculty status.
The
council decided to invite the provost to a council meeting to discuss these
issues.
3. Associate Graduate Dean’s Report: Read reported that the Graduate School was
scheduled to move to the Student Services building on September 22, 2003 and
that the move would be accomplished with as little disruption as possible. In addition, she reported that applications
for graduation should be on-line early in October to be used for the May, 2004
graduation cycle. Finally, she reported
that the
4. GSA Report:
Muehlberg reported that GSA had established two new committees, one to
look at international students issues and one to develop mentoring programs for
graduate students. In addition, she
reported that GSA was completing work on the Graduate Student Rights and
Responsibilities document and were looking at a proposal to establish a
5. Courses & Curriculum Report: No report.
6. Faculty Senate Liaison Report: Edberg reported that the Senate was working
on cleaning up the university by-laws and Code.
In addition, the Senate discussed the issue of modifying faculty
evaluations to include a “Needs Improvement” category between “Satisfactory”
and “Unsatisfactory.”
7. Policy on how long to maintain records on
students who are admitted, enroll and then drop out: Peters asked the Council for their input on
how long student records should be retained after a student ceases to
enroll. While the issue will be
eliminated through document imaging, the consensus of the Council was that
records should be retained for the time limit on course work for that degree,
i.e. 6 years for master’s degrees and 8 years for doctoral degrees.
8. Hilary Case and Kevin Gaw from the
9. Reapportionment with Reorganization: The Chair proposed that with the impending
creation of the
10. Selection of Courses & Curriculum
Representative: Read volunteered that as
it appeared that a revision of the C&C representation would require the
membership of the Associate Dean of the Graduate School, she would serve
additionally as the Council’s representative.
11. Other new business: Rawat raised the issue of some international
students not acquiring sufficient proficiency in spoken English to successfully
orally defend their thesis or dissertation or to pass oral comprehensive
examinations. Associate Dean Read will
query the graduate directors to determine the extent of the problem and report
back to the Council.
Bigbee asked if the last year’s
subcommittees were still on track to report on their activities and the Chair
reported that the Burton/Obenchain subcommittee will submit their report at
either the October or November meeting.
The Chair encouraged Council members
to forward ideas, comments, suggestions, etc. to the Chair or Associate Dean as
soon as possible rather than waiting to bring them to the next meeting.
12. There being no further business, the Council
adjourned at