Department of History,
Strategic Plan, 2003[*]
1. Departmental Vision and Background
The Department of History of a publicly funded, land-grant university has several important missions. At UNR, we impart an understanding of the past as a vital force shaping the present and the future. We serve the public by extensive research, teaching, and scholarly publications in fields that are important to audiences from the local to the international. We enrich our analysis through interdisciplinary, cross-cultural, and theoretically informed examination of the past. We unite our roles as scholars and public servants by organizing and participating in public forums and conferences in the wider community.
Our 15 tenure-track faculty members, as well as one visiting
assistant professor and two postdoctoral fellows (hired due to reappointments
of tenure-track faculty), teach curricula that lead to B.A., M.A., M.A.T.
(Master of Arts in Teaching), and Ph.D. degrees in History. We have approximately 120 undergraduate
majors, 20 M.A. students, 10 M.A.T. students, and 10 Ph.D. students. We provide high-quality undergraduate
education for students far beyond our majors.
Every one of our faculty participates actively in the University Core
Curriculum, making among the university’s most substantial contributions to
Core Humanities, diversity courses, and capstone courses. History courses are also required in many
programs in the
Over the past three years, we have built a vibrant
partnership with K-12 education in northern
We believe that our students and our community must grapple
with the historical foundations and the implications of the global context in
which we live – even more so in the wake of
2. Environmental Context and Departmental Accomplishment
Introduction. The fundamental context for all our planning efforts is the strategic planning that the Department of History began fourteen years ago. This process has occurred in four major stages:
Throughout this process, we have made clear decisions about
the areas in which we seek to build our strengths, and about the means of doing
so: reallocation of faculty lines (not simply replicating fields taught by
retiring colleagues), undergraduate and graduate curricular development, and
outreach. At every stage, we have implemented the recommendations of our planning
processes.
Disciplinary Context.
Several recent developments within the academic discipline of History
shape our vision. Above all, History
departments nationwide are recognizing the need to focus on global concerns. Between 1989 and 1999, student enrollments
nationwide in history courses that cover “areas outside of the
Moreover, an emergent new model for global history differs
from an older emphasis on “area studies” that dealt with discrete parts of the
world and often served to balkanize the study of non-Western regions (see
Stephen Kotkin, “A World War Among Professors,” New York Times,
Over the past dozen years, guided by our initial Master Plan
(1991-1992), we have become a nationally recognized department in several
increasingly important areas within our discipline. That Master Plan recommended that we
concentrate our hiring in cultural history; as a result, we now have one of the
strongest collections of cultural historians in the nation: a group that
includes cultural historians of Europe, Latin America, Asia, and the
We have significantly raised our national profile in
research. Recent and forthcoming faculty
books include publication by Harvard University Press,
We have come far from the department of fifteen years ago,
notably by making careful choices about fields of hiring. Our department once included a host of
generalists (a professor who taught Latin American and Asian history; another
who taught Russian, German, and Middle Eastern history; another who taught
African and African American history). To
build our research strength and our national profile, we have sought
specialists – as do all major universities.
The result is a department stronger than it has ever been. The department has made choices in the name
of excellence: We could not with a fixed number of faculty positions replace
all the areas once covered by a generalist faculty. Nor is it the case that (for example) a
first-rate scholar of Russian history will also be an accomplished historian of
the
Partnership with K-12 Education. In 2001, Congress appropriated $50 million to
create the Teaching American History (TAH) grant program in the U.S. Department
of Education. Through TAH grants, school
districts work with universities to develop history-content-rich professional
development for K-12 social studies teachers.
Since 2001, this appropriation has grown to $100 million annually. In partnership with
In the two years since, our faculty have developed and run an array of programs for social-studies teachers in Washoe and surrounding counties: credit-granting Institutes every spring and summer; a series of Saturday Seminars on specific historical topics, including nationally prominent guest speakers; three-day Primary Source Workshops; Saturday Dialogues in History directed by our faculty; Book Clubs in which teachers discuss recent scholarly works with a UNR faculty facilitator. More than 100 teachers have participated in TAHP programs, creating a vibrant community that did not previously exist among local social-studies teachers. Teachers in TAHP programs have developed curriculum units and lesson plans – all placed on the TAHP website (www.washoe.k12.nv.us/americanhistory/) for the use of other teachers.
Our TAHP has been recognized nationwide, especially for the
role that the University has played and for our M.A.T. program. Most school districts that were awarded
grants, it seems, have encountered difficulty building partnerships with
universities, and have therefore hewed to a narrow range of professional development
programs. Other districts are beginning
to use our programs as models.
This unexpected challenge – and success – has energized our faculty to work with K-12 teachers year-round. It also presents new challenges. For the first two years (2001-2003), one faculty member worked with WCSD personnel to write the grant and coordinate all of UNR’s participation, from faculty involvement to logistics. Currently, the department chair has assumed that role and will work with WCSD this spring to write a grant proposal for 2004-2007. Although a small stipend is attached, this responsibility is taxing: it is an overload, on top of one’s teaching, research, and service commitments.
Enrollment Trends and Student Objectives. On the whole, our enrollments have outpaced the University’s growth (based on data from Institutional Analysis). Over the past two years, FTE in History courses has grown by 16.2% (15.9% in undergraduate courses, 18.7% in graduate courses), in comparison to the university’s overall 10.3% increase. Moreover, the same period has witnessed a 23.5% increase in enrollment in Western Traditions/Core Humanities, in which History faculty and teaching assistants play a major role.
Within History, undergraduate enrollments in all areas of
the curriculum have grown. Particularly
noteworthy are enrollments in Latin American and Asian history, where survey
courses draw between 40 and 100 students and upper-division courses often
exceed 35. Nearly all of these courses
fulfill the Core diversity requirement; the demand also demonstrates our
students’ interest in areas of the world beyond the
A degree in History equips students for a variety of careers. Some of our majors envision graduate work in History (recent graduates have gone on to programs at the University of Arizona, Tulane University, the University of Oklahoma, and elsewhere); others intend to pursue teaching careers in middle-school or high-school social studies. The skills acquired in the study of History – especially in a program such as ours, with an explicit focus on historical thinking skills – enable students to pursue a variety of other careers: for example, law, public service, writing and editing, international relations.
University and System Strategic Planning. Several initiatives described in the UNR Strategic Plan (2001) and the UCCSN Strategic Plan (2002) have particular relevance to the Department of History. The Board of Regents’ plan emphasizes “that all students have an opportunity to increase their understanding of other cultures through [institutions’] educational programs and activities”; similarly, the UNR plan echoes its mission statement on “ethnic and cultural diversity” and goes further, to call for “recruit[ing] faculty who are qualified to teach world traditions courses.” The Regents also make “partnerships with the K-12 system” one of their six paramount goals. Several other emphases of the UNR plan are central to our Department’s mission: the emphasis on environmental studies aligns well with our long-standing strength in environmental history (three faculty in this area); one of our postdoctoral fellows has helped organize the proposed center (currently consortium) in Gender and Identity Studies; and we look forward to working with the proposed consortium/center in Global Studies.
Excellence in teaching, emphasized throughout the UNR and UCCSN priorities, is a hallmark of the Department of History. The University has recognized this strength, honoring six of our fifteen faculty as winners or runners-up for the College or University teaching awards, three within the past five years. Equally important as a standard for student learning, recent discussion among chairs of History departments nationwide (on the American Historical Association chairs’ list-serve) has emphasized students’ skills in historical thinking and analysis – rather than mastery of particular bodies of factual information – as the basis for meaningful assessment. We have been ahead of the profession in this focus, developing in the mid-1990s a template of historical thinking skills at the heart of our teaching and our learning expectations.
The emphasis on undergraduate research opportunities, in both the UCCSN and the UNR strategic plans, dovetails with our own endeavors of the past five years. All History majors now write a senior thesis (History 499, instituted 2001). As of fall 2003, majors also take a required course in Historical Research and Writing (History 300), designed to prepare them for the rigorous expectations of upper-division work and especially the thesis. These requirements are central to our assessment plan (approved in 2002). They build students’ mastery of our skills-based curriculum and ultimately afford students the opportunity to demonstrate that accomplishment in a significant work of scholarship (written thesis and oral presentation), which is evaluated by the faculty. Mentoring undergraduate thesis students requires an intensive commitment of faculty time, particularly because the thesis topics are often far removed from the mentor’s own research areas.
Above all, the Core Curriculum – one of the four highest priorities of the UNR plan – relies heavily on the Department of History, and we look forward to the opportunity to continue shaping its development. Most of our faculty and teaching assistants teach in Core Humanities: generally eight faculty serve as lecturers every year (approx. 600 students); eight faculty and eight graduate students teach a total of twenty-four discussion sections (approx. 480 students). We offer more Diversity courses than any other department on campus, and teach on average 6.5 such courses per year. All of our faculty offer Capstone courses; we teach on average nine Capstones a year. All of these are General (not majors-only) Capstones, attracting students from across the University’s colleges and programs. We do not merely staff Core courses; we also have promoted innovation within the Core. Our Core Humanities faculty have helped shape the curriculum of CH 202 and 203 by editing and frequently revising its primary-text readers, published by Pearson. We consistently develop new Core courses: since 2001 alone, four new diversity courses and eleven new capstone courses.
3. Departmental Goals
Our department identifies for itself the following general goals:
A. Maintain and deepen our excellence in research, and become known as a department for particular areas of scholarly depth.
B. Continuously strengthen our undergraduate curriculum, for majors and non-majors.
C. Contribute to our students’ and our community’s engagement with a global context.
D. Become known as a leader in university relationships with K-12 education.
E. Enhance departmental development efforts internally, locally, and nationally.
4. Objectives and Strategies Associated with Department Goals
Two overriding strategies deserve primary mention. Each contributes to multiple goals; for this reason, we describe them first, followed by objectives and strategies keyed to our specific goals.
Overriding strategy #1: Hire a tenure-track faculty
member (new position) to specialize in colonial/post-colonial studies (the historical
era and aftermath of colonialism in culture, politics, society, and economy). The emphasis should be on Africa, Asia,
and/or the
Clearly,
this position is vital to departmental goals B and C above (undergraduate
curriculum; students’ and community engagement with global context). This position will expand the Department’s
offerings into new areas where otherwise no courses will be offered, and will
also bring in new enrollment among students increasingly interested in Asia and
We envision this position also as an important element of enhancing our scholarly reputation and our linkages with K-12 education (goals A and D). Colonial/postcolonial studies is a significant and growing area within historical scholarship, as well as within other fields (literature, sociology). Hiring a specialist in this area will necessarily bring us a scholar with an international reputation and global colleagues. We also expect that the person hired will become part of our efforts in K-12 education, with a mission to strengthen K-12 educators’ knowledge of the non-Western world.
Overriding strategy #2: Hire a tenure-track faculty
member who will become the coordinator of our K-12 efforts and will contribute
substantially to our research focus and curriculum. As stated above, our success in building a
partnership with K-12 education in northern
We envision
a faculty position initially funded at .75 FTE, the remainder of the salary to
come through the grant. We would want to
hire in the field of medical history and humanities, with an emphasis on
America/United States, a position described in our 2001 Master Plan. In this way, we will be accomplishing several
of our goals. First, we would build in
an area of significant existing research strength (goal A): the history of
science and medicine. Currently, our
three specialists in this field, three of our fifteen tenure-track faculty
specialize in this field, an unusually strong concentration and a large number
in a faculty of any size, include two historians of Europe and one of
Beyond these overriding strategies, we intend to approach each of the Department’s goals with a combination of specific objectives and strategies. Many of these are ongoing objectives and strategies; where appropriate we have identified target dates for completion.
A. Maintain and
deepen our excellence in research, and become known as a department for
particular areas of scholarly depth.
Objective – Enhance
the conditions for faculty research productivity.
Objective – Build the
department’s reputation in particular areas of scholarly depth.
B. Continuously
strengthen our undergraduate curriculum, for majors and non-majors.
Objective – Enhance UNR’s offerings in global history (see also goal C below).
Objective – Develop
particular curricular emphases designed to reflect departmental strengths and
students’ career objectives.
Objective – Continue
to refine the major requirements.
Objective – Continue to participate actively in the Core Curriculum and its evolution.
Objective – Recruit
the most outstanding candidates for all teaching, including LOAs.
Objective – Publish
our expectations for History students.
Objective – Recognize
outstanding undergraduate achievement in History.
C. Contribute to our
students’ and our community’s engagement with a global context.
Objective – Enhance UNR’s curricular offerings in global studies.
Objective – Enhance
UNR’s co-curricular opportunities related to global studies.
Objective – Deepen
understanding in northern
D. Become known as a
leader in university relationships with K-12 education.
Objective – Continue
our partnership in the Teaching American History Project with
Objective – Seek out other avenues for work with K-12 education.
Objective – Gain national reputation for our efforts in K-12 education.
E. Enhance
departmental development efforts internally, locally, and nationally.
Objective – Promote our courses and our Department more effectively within the University.
Objective – Raise our community profile, with an eye toward funding opportunities.
Objective – Raise our Department’s profile within the discipline of History.
5. Resources
a. Personnel
b. Budgetary
Professional salaries and fringe: $ 1,422,781
Classified salaries and fringe: $ 42,614
Graduate assistantships and fringe: $ 142,450
Departmental operating budget: $ 27,587
Fund raising: variable
John & Marie Noble Fund for Historical Research (endowment income): $ 13,000
Endowed scholarships: $ 15,000
c. Space
Office space for faculty: 2607 assignable square feet (ASF)
Department office space: 541 ASF
Graduate assistant offices: 463 ASF
Computer lab: 88 ASF
TOTAL: 3699 ASF
Resource Strategies: Operating Budget and Endowment Opportunities
Until fall 2003, our operating budget had been woefully inadequate to meet routine operating expenses. We relied on the Core Curriculum to defray some photocopying expenses; on the College or the Faculty Senate to assist in computer funding; on a single administrative assistant to manage a department of 15 regular faculty, various other instructional staff, 40 graduate students, and 120 majors; and on the sacrifice and generosity of faculty to purchase teaching supplies themselves and defray research expenses from their own salaries. Much did not happen: as administrative paperwork increased, we ceased to publish our department newsletter; we infrequently updated the department website. The Department had regular operating funds neither for travel support of research nor for external speakers – the lifeblood of engagement with the discipline, for faculty and especially for undergraduate and graduate students.
A substantial increase in our operating budget this fall opens several new possibilities. We will be able to cover our routine operating expenses. We will offer limited operating support for research and create a fund for external speakers. We will hire a student worker, who will have primary responsibility for updating the department website and assisting faculty with web materials for courses, thus decreasing our photocopying expenses. This student worker will also perform light office work (photocopying, phone and walk-in reception) so that our administrative assistant can work on development efforts, including reviving the newsletter.
In addition, the University’s new computer replacement fund will enable us to reduce the budget for computer equipment, much of which has been spent to purchase new computers for faculty with aged machines and to purchase upgraded operating systems to squeeze life out of barely functional machines.
We hope that our newsletter and related development activity will produce added discretionary funds. Some of these funds would enhance existing endowments: our scholarship endowments, the John and Marie Noble Fund for Historical Research, the Richard and Sharon Davies endowment for graduate student research, and the Elsie Edwards Library Fund. We currently have a small discretionary fund, generally used for celebrations of student accomplishment (lunch following senior thesis presentations, lunch to honor scholarship recipients). New discretionary funds will be earmarked and endowed to support a senior thesis prize ($200-300/semester) and to support an annual symposium series (c. $1500/year).
Resource Strategies: Faculty Positions
We consistently reallocate positions to meet our strategic
objectives. Each Master Plan since
1991-1992 has re-envisioned anticipated retirement positions in accordance with
developments in the discipline and curricular imperatives. We have always followed those plans. Since 2002, when History faculty have been
named Distinguished Professors in the Humanities, we have hired postdoctoral
fellows (funded by the Core Humanities grant) not merely to fill the curricular
shoes of the professors who are teaching fewer History courses, but to begin
addressing the hiring priorities in Master Plan 3 (2001-2002). Thus our two current postdoctoral fellows are
specialists in
Earlier in this strategic plan, the Department described
three faculty positions it seeks to create over the next five years. Two are new positions: colonial/postcolonial
studies (our first priority) and medical history/humanities/K-12 coordinator
(our second priority). One is an
essential retirement replacement in twentieth-century
On balance, the professional salaries of the requested new lines and reallocated position ultimately require less than $2,000 in additional funds after the retirement. Depending on when the hires occur, they will require additional funds in earlier years. Because devoting a constant operating budget to an increasing number of faculty would compromise our new financial health, we request a commensurate operating increase. In 2003, that would be $1,500 per faculty member.
Reallocated position
(Rank IV), as of fall 2007:
Position
10266 (
$137,465 in 2006-2007, assuming annual 1-step merit (a modest estimate) & 2% COLA.
Positions requested
(all Rank II):[†]
2005-2006 salary operating
Colonial/postcolonial studies (new) $ 49,000 $1,500
K-12 Coordinator/
Medical History & Humanities (initially .75FTE) (new) $ 36,750 $1,125
2007-2008
United States in a Global Context (replacement) $ 53,500
Positions requested, 2005-2008: $ 139,250 $2,625
Less reallocation: $ 137,465
Total funds requested $ 1,785 $2,625
Space: In order to accommodate new faculty, we
anticipate several shifts in our current space use. Two small faculty offices are currently
occupied by postdoctoral fellows and emeritus professors. As of fall 2004, one will be occupied by a
former UNR administrator returning to the department. The other will become the office of the first
new faculty member hired (colonial/post-colonial studies). Should we hire the second new faculty member
(K-12 coordinator/US medicine & science) prior to the anticipated
retirement or the anticipated new space upon Getchell remodeling, one of our
two graduate assistant offices will become a faculty office. We have also inaugurated a policy in which
faculty who are physically away from
At most, therefore, we envision very modest renovation costs (c. $3,000): slight upgrading of the offices to be converted, which we will absorb from our own funds. When the Department gains additional space due to the Getchell remodel, we may require renovation funds; however, this is not anticipated in the scope of the current document (2003-2007).
6. Performance Indicators
Overall
Excellence in Research
Undergraduate Curriculum
Engagement with a Global Context
Relationships with K-12 Education
Departmental Development Efforts
[*] Process: The core of this plan emerges from the
Department’s most recent Master Plan (2001-2002; see below). Our 2002 Strategic Plan described a process
for subsequent Strategic Plans: a faculty committee appointed by the chair
would review the most recent Master Plan and Strategic Plans to analyze
progress toward stated objectives.
Thereafter Department faculty would write the current Strategic Plan,
which must be reviewed and formally adopted by the full faculty. This year’s committee included Barbara Walker
chair), Andrew Nolan, and Hugh Shapiro; the Strategic Plan was drafted by
department chair Scott Casper in consultation with that committee; the
Department of History voted to adopt it on
[†] Salaries calculated based upon American Historical Association data for assistant professor salaries in History in public institutions 2002, with estimate of 4.5% yearly increase. Fringe not included.