|
Reflections
on Studying at the Kroc Institute for International
Peace Studies
In
1994-1995 I had the opportunity to study at the University
of Notre Dame (South Bend, Indiana) where the Joan
B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies
offers a multidisciplinary Master of Arts degree in
Peace Studies.
The
Institute selects approximately 20 students per year
(applications average 140) from all over the world,
with varying backgrounds and undergraduate emphases,
most of whom receive fellowships for tuition and stipends
for living expenses during the year. The institute currently
has more than 250 alumni from over 55 countries.
Each
year 12-14 of the 20 students chosen for the MA have
the opportunity to live in community on campus in what
is called Peace House. I was fortunate enough to be
chosen from South Africa and I lived with wonderful
people from China, Mexico, Brazil, Canada, the Netherlands,
the Basque Country, Russia, Malaysia, Palestine, India,
Israel, the United States, and Kenya. Of course, living
with any 12 people would have its difficulties. However,
these were only compounded by our personal, cultural,
religious and political differences.
Our
coursework covered the causes of war and intergroup
violence, the dynamics of conflict and techniques of
conflict resolution, the building blocks of a peaceful
and just world order, the protection of internationally
recognized human rights, the promotion of economic well-being
for all, and the international protection of the global
ecosystem. Coursework and colloquia in international
mediation, negotiation, economics, non-violence, the
United Nations, peer mediation and peace education,
among others, contributed to our knowledge in these
areas. At the end of our year along with taking comprehensive
exams, we were responsible for writing a common statement
_ yes, all 13 of us had to agree on what to say. It
was an exhausting task to say the least. Our 50-page
statement on "Confronting Globalization: The Challenge
to Civil Society" was indeed an example of conflict
in action.
Certainly,
the coursework was challenging; but even more so was
living in community. At times we felt like "a conflict
experiment" or "rats in an observation box."
The year gave rise to heated arguments, misunderstandings,
frustrations, seemingly "cross cultural" issues
of gender expectations regarding house chores, and political
protests (house members refusing to attend house meetings
due to their strongly opposed political views). The
theoretical and practical knowledge we were acquiring
related to conflict resolution was often put to the
test. We were not always able to resolve issues or agree;
but on the whole, we found ways to live together. Through
all of this turmoil, we grew a lot. We departed as friends,
and continue - all of us (amazingly!) - to keep in touch.
In
community we grappled with idealism related to world
peace and nonviolence, especially as we faced the realities
of war. This was a particularly sensitive subject as
one of the students (Senada) in the program was from
Bosnia, where war was indeed a reality. Just imagine
the emotional exchanges she (a Bosnian Muslim), a Serb
student (Milica) also in the program and all of us in
Peace House had during those days. And only this week,
4 years later, we hear via email from Milica in Belgrade.
She talks of bombings and sirens during this "crisis
in Kosovo." She and Senada became friends while
at Notre Dame. Both are now married and have 2-year-old
sons. Unhappily, our talk at Notre Dame of peace and
a more just world order now seems so distant.
As
I sit and write this reflection piece, the bombs fall
in Belgrade and I continue my quiet life as usual. I
glance up at my wall, where a poster states:
Just War is:
just
destruction,
just
suffering,
just
agony,
just
bloodshed,
just
killing,
just
murder,
just
carnage,
just
death
...
just war?
Brent
Graber
How easy it was, in those days at Notre Dame to talk
of peace and non-violence. How should tyrants, dictators,
and those who commit genocide be stopped? It is easy
to feel hopeless when trying to grapple morally and
ethically with the issues at stake. We must, however,
continue to believe and work toward a more just world.
Having recently returned from a visit home to South
Africa it is clear to me that systems of oppression
can be dismantled. Yes, it is true that feelings of
anger, hatred, and resentment take time to heal - if
ever completely - and that rebuilding a more socially
and economically just society takes generations, but
it must be possible.
We must make sure that genocide and other atrocities
do not occur in the 21st Century!
Cath
Byrne
|
|