Revised: July 2012
To conform to Board of Regents policies for low-yield program review and to provide data for an early warning to potential low-yield programs, the Office of Institutional Analysis annually produces for the President and Executive Vice President & Provost a report of all academic programs that are identified as low-yield according to criteria established by the Board of Regents. The policy also provides for exceptions based on criteria described in the Board of Regents Handbook (Title 4, Chapter 14).
Academic programs designated as low-yield in this annual report from Institutional Analysis are reviewed by the President and Executive Vice President & Provost in consultation with the Faculty Senate the year in which they meet the low-yield thresholds. According to Regents' policy, action is required within the following three years regarding a program's continuation, merger, or exemption from low-yield. This three-year period provides an early warning for programs in the low-yield category.
The President is required to report annually to the Chancellor all programs designated low-yield within three years of the program initially reaching the low-yield thresholds. Also included will be the results of the institutional review process of such programs. This report to the chancellor will not include programs in their first and second year of low-yield status.
In order to have clean and consistent data, the following guidelines will be used to prepare the report for the President and the Executive Vice President & Provost:
Emphases and specializations within a major will not be treated separately; the lowest unit of analysis will be an academic major. An academic unit (department) having more than one academic major will have each academic major examined separately in relation criteria for low-yield. However, the University has the prerogative of exempting from low-yield status a program that is one of several programs provided by an academic unit or that can be justified for other reasons deemed adequate by the Provost's Office and consistent with Regents' criteria. This decision will be made annually by the Provost's Office after reviewing the data identified above.